Posts Tagged ‘rick scott’

Trigger-Happy…Just Shoot Me

Monday, June 8th, 2009

trigger1I have an idea: When we realize we have a debilitating problem with our health care system and our medical bills are causing families to go bankrupt, why don’t we draft a reform proposal that actually does nothing to reform the system, but includes a procrastination clause that states that maybe later when the insurance industry is not sticking to their promises and millions of Americans are still uninsured and bankrupt- we might then decide to provide a solution. That way we can call it reform but really it’s just delay and avoidance. Sounds good right?

Well I can’t take credit because I didn’t come up with the idea – the conservatives and health insurance executives concocted that brilliant proposal. Yes, this ridiculous scheme – a fall back option for the public health insurance plan – actually does exist. It’s called the “trigger” and it is quickly spreading through Congress.

A public health insurance plan, either in the form of Medicare or an insurance pool that provides a choice of coverage for all Americans, has been the main topic of discussion in the health care reform debate thus far (unfortunately more progressive options such as single-payer health care are just getting laughed off of the stage by industry and conservatives – but hey, maybe one day we will get there.) The “trigger” is basically a way to kill the public health insurance option before it even gets out of the gate. The proposal calls for a public option to kick in a few years down the road, only if “triggered” – in others words, when private insurance companies fail to bring down health care costs and expand coverage. Well, we all know that in legislative terms “a few years” means never and that the private industry has already failed at cutting costs and expanding coverage. So why delay the inevitable need for a real solution?

But there is hope for health care reform, in fact, President Obama is not backing off of his stance for a public health insurance option. The President met with a group of senators last Tuesday and wrote a letter to Senators Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Baucus (D-Mont.), both chairmen on the leading health reform committees, that was wrought with a sense of urgency and insistence on a public choice for all Americans. See a clip from the letter below:

I strongly believe that Americans should have the choice of a public health insurance option operating alongside private plans. This will give them a better range of choices, make the health care market more competitive, and keep insurance companies honest.

(more…)

Liars and Deal-Breakers

Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

pdsi022977

You know you’re getting into the thick of a debate when the gloves come off, the lying begins, and promises are broken just as soon as they’re made. Well, roll up your sleeves, because we’re wading into the thick of the health care reform debate and its about to get ugly.

Former health insurance executive Rick Scott, recently released ads with the aim of spreading fear, warning that if Obama’s health care reform passes, Americans will “lose control of their medical system”. These ads were released through Scott’s group, Conservatives for Patients Rights (CPR), who have loudly voiced their opposition to the progressive health care reform advocated by Health Care for America NOW(HCAN). In turn, HCAN released their own ads exposing Rick Scott for his health insurance fraud and rhetoric. Not to be outdone and in a desperate attempt to raise funds, CPR quickly sent a boastful letter to their supporters, proclaiming that Comcast pulled HCAN’s ads from the air due to misleading content.

That claim was a blatant lie. Comcast confirmed to HCAN that the ads had simply expired from their original media buy and will return to the airwaves soon.

In further heated news, health insurance executives have already backed out of their commitment to President Obama to cut costs in national health care spending. Executives are claiming that the whole discussion was misunderstood and overstated. Instead of the firm commitment to trim $2 trillion from health care spending, the industry is now using terms such as “eventually”, “gradually”, and “not specific” on when the spending “target” would be achieved. Breaking that commitment didn’t take long and just proves that we can’t leave it up to the insurance industry for real reform.