Posts Tagged ‘public health insurance’

Trigger-Happy…Just Shoot Me

Monday, June 8th, 2009

trigger1I have an idea: When we realize we have a debilitating problem with our health care system and our medical bills are causing families to go bankrupt, why don’t we draft a reform proposal that actually does nothing to reform the system, but includes a procrastination clause that states that maybe later when the insurance industry is not sticking to their promises and millions of Americans are still uninsured and bankrupt- we might then decide to provide a solution. That way we can call it reform but really it’s just delay and avoidance. Sounds good right?

Well I can’t take credit because I didn’t come up with the idea – the conservatives and health insurance executives concocted that brilliant proposal. Yes, this ridiculous scheme – a fall back option for the public health insurance plan – actually does exist. It’s called the “trigger” and it is quickly spreading through Congress.

A public health insurance plan, either in the form of Medicare or an insurance pool that provides a choice of coverage for all Americans, has been the main topic of discussion in the health care reform debate thus far (unfortunately more progressive options such as single-payer health care are just getting laughed off of the stage by industry and conservatives – but hey, maybe one day we will get there.) The “trigger” is basically a way to kill the public health insurance option before it even gets out of the gate. The proposal calls for a public option to kick in a few years down the road, only if “triggered” – in others words, when private insurance companies fail to bring down health care costs and expand coverage. Well, we all know that in legislative terms “a few years” means never and that the private industry has already failed at cutting costs and expanding coverage. So why delay the inevitable need for a real solution?

But there is hope for health care reform, in fact, President Obama is not backing off of his stance for a public health insurance option. The President met with a group of senators last Tuesday and wrote a letter to Senators Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Baucus (D-Mont.), both chairmen on the leading health reform committees, that was wrought with a sense of urgency and insistence on a public choice for all Americans. See a clip from the letter below:

I strongly believe that Americans should have the choice of a public health insurance option operating alongside private plans. This will give them a better range of choices, make the health care market more competitive, and keep insurance companies honest.

(more…)

Why a Public Plan is Good for Young People

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

Public (Option) Enemy #1, by Campus Progress writer, Dylan Matthews, explores the option of a public health insurance plan amidst the current debate for health care reform and its benefits for young people, as well as its opposition from legislators like McConnell (R-KY) and the private insurance big wigs.

The public plan, both alone and as part of a broader health care package, would provide substantial benefits for young workers between 20 and 30. “Right now the insurance market is very, very difficult to navigate for a young freelancer trying to navigate the rest of their job details,” explains Matt Singer, CEO of the progressive activist organization Forward Montana. “The health insurance exchange/connecter outlined in both the Baucus and the Obama plans, plus the public health insurance option, will make the whole system more navigable for people overwhelmed with a lot of other pieces in the reform.”

Singer added that the cost savings of the plan would be particularly attractive to young workers’ employers. Based on his own experience running the health insurance plan for Forward Montana’s employees, an exchange including a public option would be helpful for those administrators determining health coverage for their young employees. “First, we’d end up in a bigger pool, which would bring our rates down,” he explains. In other words, the public option would have a larger group of people purchasing insurance than in pools of employer insurance plans, meaning that risk can be shared more widely, ultimately bringing costs down.

Read more here