Archive for April, 2010

The Fear-Mongering Has Switched Focus…from Health Care to LGBT Rights

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

The job of the U.S. Congress is a never-ending one.  After putting to bed the heated debate to transform the nation’s health care system, Congress switches gears and looks ahead to its list of immediate to dos:

1. Tackle the country’s financial problems

2. Create jobs

3. Enforce climate laws that will curb carbon emissions and create clean energy systems

4. Reform immigration policy

5. Give equal rights to the LGBT community by such things as repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell and passing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act

…and that’s just to name a few.

Well Congress is not the only group with a never-ending agenda. All of us on the outskirts are keeping up the momentum as well and refocusing attention to ensure the voices of the people in America are heard and the policies they demand are passed.  However, some conservative, religious and right-wing groups, like those that fought tooth and nail trying to kill the health care bill, have the same old agenda that is never-ending:  Block everything on the President’s to do list and spread fear through this nation like wild fire, no matter what the issue.

Such is the case now with the rights of the LGBT community.  The Employee Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is a bill that is expected to be voted on in the House very soon, and is aimed at protecting the LGBT community from employment discrimination. This legislation is so important because in 29 states it is still legal for employers to discriminate based on sexual orientation. Ending discrimination, however, is apparently something Americans should be afraid of according to some groups.

Immediately, the same type of fear-mongering ads we saw against health care reform just a few months ago have reappeared to attack ENDA. Two very different issues, yes, and some different groups, but all the qualities are very similar: fear, fear and more fear, nothing substantial to say, and no proof of knowledge on the legislation at hand. Check out this Family Research Council ad to fight ENDA:

Is it me or did that video tell you a whole lot of nothing?  There was no elaboration on comments like those from Marcia, the licensed counselor, who insinuated that religious people would lose their job from this legislation. There was plenty of terrifying music and telling, ominous statements, but with nothing to back them up.  Maybe in the detailed documentary there is more elaboration, like Marcia explaining that people losing their jobs would only be those not willing to comply with federal law because they are insistent on illegally discriminating against employees and justifying their actions on the basis of personal religious beliefs.  So if I own a company and I decide that all people with green eyes are evil, then I fire and abstain from hiring all green-eyed people, and defend my ridiculous actions by saying that those green-eyed monsters do not fall in line with my personal religious beliefs, I cannot act surprised if I lose my job by not complying with federal non-discrimination laws.  But who needs explanations or details, that’s not the point. The point is that we should be afraid, very afraid.

Have no doubt, these ad campaigns will continue and grow larger among groups like these in the coming months. But we all have to remember to check the facts and not fall for the same old fear-based obstruction. The progressive agenda is one that aims to secure rights for all to have fair access to jobs, health care, education, clean air, a chance to serve your country and marry your partner of the same sex or not. I don’t think that’s anything to be scared of.

Goin’, goin’, back, back.. on my parents’ insurance

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

So you’re under 26, your uninsured,  maybe about to get kicked off your school’s insurance at graduation or you just got laid off from your new job and its employer provided insurance – no worries, with health care reform you can go back on your parents’ insurance plan (or stay on it) up to age 26. How will all of this work? And when does it kick in? Check out these FAQs and other resources on how health care reform impacts young people:

FAQs on Staying on Your Parents’ Plan up to age 26

One of the greatest provisions for young people in the health care bill is the ability to stay on your parents’ insurance plan until age 26. However, some people have questions about how that will work or whether it will cost their parents’ more money. But it’s actually pretty simple. Check out some frequently asked questions:

Q. Who is eligible for the age 26 provision?

The age 26 provision is eligible for young adults whose parents have insurance plans that provide dependent coverage for children (which most plans do). The health care reform bill requires any group health plan or plan in the individual market that provides dependent coverage for children to continue to make that coverage available up to age 26.

Q. When will this provision take effect?

Young adults under the age of 26 will be able to take advantage of this provision as of September 2010, six months after the enactment of the legislation (March 23, 2010).

Q.  How much will this cost my parents?

Parents will simply be paying as they did when young people were on their plans previously, at a family plan rate. However, there may be slight rate increases for family plans due to the extra years in coverage.

Q.  Does it matter what state I live in?

Many states have their own laws for dependent coverage so you should look to see what rules your state has. (State Health Access Reform Evaluation (SHARE) – To get information on dependent coverage laws in your state.). The new federal law establishes a minimum level of dependent coverage up to your 26th birthday. If your state law requires more coverage than the federal law, it is likely that the state law will still apply.

Click here to see more FAQs.

Click here to learn more about reform and what it means for you.

College Students Overwhelmingly Support Gay Marriage

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

According to this survey by the Higher Education Research Institute, college freshmen surpass the general population in support of gay marriage by quite a large gap: 65% of college freshman compared to 39% of the general population support same-sex marriage.  And this leap in support also branches across the conservative student population. Check out this piece on Change.org:

Even far right frosh support same-sex marriage at a greater rate than those far right conservatives out there in the working world — 24% to 14% to be exact, or as exact as a research poll can be.

So, these kids have just been shipped off to a new place, full of new people, new ideas and new experiences, and they’re learning how to incorporate all of that into their world view while still maintaining some sense of themselves. And that, somehow, makes them more open to varying forms of human relationships. Huh. When I put it that way, they kind of sound like a decent barometer of the next generation’s views toward same-sex marriage.

Read More —>

The Coal Barons are Coming, the Coal Barons Are Coming!

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Coal sucksOn April 14th, 2009 at 9:30 AM, coal barons are finally testifying in front of Congress about the “The Role of Coal in a New Energy Age.”

Coal is the single most dangerous form of energy and, despite many claims by industry spokespeople, is not clean and cannot be cleaned. While industry front groups are spending millions of dollars convincing Americans that CO2 emissions from coal can be tucked away safely, all evidence shows the contrary, that doing so is technically dubious, extremely expensive, and environmentally disastrous.

Young people will welcome these criminals that deal in coal, the most deadly weapon of mass destruction! We will let them and anyone watching know that young people don’t want coal to have a role in the New Energy Age, that we demand fair worker transition programs for coal miners, clean energy for the nation, and stable climate for future generations!

If you live in the D.C. area, sign up here to help organize the welcoming reception. If you’d like to walk around and sign people up with some old school tabling or canvassing, you can find a handy sign-up form here.

Students Challenge “Crisis Pregnancy Centers”

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

The Feminist Majority Foundation’s Campus Program (let’s call them Campus FMF) and Change.org have teamed up on a new campaign to both expose Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPC’s) on campus, and end federal funding for “fake clinics” and abstinence only programs.

A study by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in the House of Representatives found that 87% of the clinics they examined provided false or misleading information about the health risks of abortions and the effectivness of contraceptives. Despite these issues, states will be able to channel millions in federal funds to CPC’s  under the Hatch amendment, which was slipped into the health care bill.

Everyone can take action online now. Students can get even more involved, however, by joining Campus FMF’s campaign. They have put together a great toolkit that can help you find and expose less than truthful clinics that are targeting students at your campus, and push for clear “truth in advertising” policies to protect your classmates.


Young People Respond to Oil Drilling

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

Recently, the Obama Administration announced that they will approve new oil and gas drilling off Virginia’s coast, parts of the mid and south Atlantic, and near Alaska’s shores. This news has come to a surprise to many of Obama’s supporters, especially young people who are dedicated to preserving the environment. Here are a few questions that young people have asked about Obama’s decision to drill for oil. Hopefully the administration will be answering these questions at some point in the near future

Confused 005Shouldn’t Obama be using drilling as a bargaining chip for real climate legislation, rather than an Easter present to the oil industry? Cadbury eggs are much better for the environment.Confused 008

Why is Obama doing this now? Is it because he feels like people will hate him less since he gave us health care?

Confused 003 Is there anyone who feels like this is more than a temporary solution to a much bigger problem?

Confused 007 Why do they think this is worth the destruction? Is this an attempt to cross party lines?

Confused 006How is he going to address his liberal environmental base on this issue?

Confused 004

Young people from coastal communities knocked on thousands of doors for the President in large part because of what has now become a broken promise. Is the President counting on similar enthusiasm from young people during the mid-term elections? If so, how will young people be motivated to do so when the President is loudest in announcing his support for dirty energy?

But the overwhelming majority of people asked this:

WTF?!