Archive for July, 2009

HELP is on the Way; CBO scores Reveal Public Plan Saves Money and Covers More

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

A few weeks ago, the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee submitted an unfinished version of their bill for scoring by the Congressional Budget Office.  The results were bad: a cost of $1 trillion with coverage for only one-third of the uninsured.  People freaked out.  Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) declared the “death. . . [of] a government run health care plan.”  But somewhere along the way, these people (both Republican and Democrat) seemed to forget that this incomplete bill had excised language about the public plan or an employer mandate.  The bill that had been scored had no mention of Graham’s government health care plan.

But since then, the missing language has been added, detailing both the public plan (named the “Community Health Insurance Plan”) and an employer mandate.  CBO scores came back yesterday, and they’re suprising:

The plan carries a 10-year price tag of slightly over $600 billion, and would lead toward an estimated 97 percent of all Americans having coverage, according to the Congressional Budget Office, Sens. Edward M. Kennedy and Chris Dodd said in a letter to other members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.

Chew on that, naysayers.

And while Jonathan Cohn, of The New Republic, reminds us that the total cost of health care reforms will be $1 trillion (once reforms to Medicare not under the jurisdiction of the HELP committee are added in), a trillion happens to be the magic target Obama and Congress are aiming for.  The ways to pay for this have been worked out and are already on the table.

Wonk Room has the details of the new plan:

- Community Health Insurance Option: Will have to compete on a level playing field with private providers and offer competitive rates and premiums. Presumably, the plan will be able to use its administrative efficiency and its market power (assuming it is able to attract a significant number of applicants and providers) to lower premiums.

- Employer mandate: Large employers would have to provide coverage to their workers or pay $750 per full-time employee, $375 for each part-time employee. Businesses with less than 25 employees will receive a tax credit, on a sliding scale, based on the number of workers. Ezra Klein points out, “the CBO estimates that “a mere 150,000 will lose their coverage. That’s nothing. And it means that a lot more Americans end up insured and the government spends a lot less in subsidies.”

With savings that good, it’s no wonder the AMA has decided to endorse the public plan.

Let’s Just Be Clear..

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

letter1While Obama may be turning up the heat on his push for health care reform, the other side is pulling out the big guns as well…or trying to. Just yesterday the group Get Health Reform Right, which is funded by the insurance industry, sent out a grassroots email to garner support (or spread rhetoric and scare Americans into fearing a government-run public option that will provide health care for all- whichever way you want to look at it) for their mission.

Jason Rosenbaum from Health Care for America NOW (HCAN) cleverly deciphered the email and re-wrote it in order to present its true meaning:

The health care reform debate is heating up in Washington and our profits have a stake in the outcome. Draft health reform legislation in the House of Representatives is now under consideration.  While this draft legislation takes some of the critical steps needed to transform our health care system and expand coverage, it also forces us to compete and actually provide health insurance, or lose money. We don’t like that.

We keep saying that it is critically important to enact comprehensive health care reform this year, but we’re really worried that our CEOs won’t be able to take that 2nd vacation this year if our profits get cut a couple percentage points. So we’re going to tell people that offering them a choice of a public health insurance option somehow will cause them to lose health care. It’s not true, but it sure is scary! And if we scare them enough, maybe they’ll complain to their Members of Congress!

If we actually had to compete, we couldn’t pay our CEOs billions, and we would have to stop denying care for pre-existing conditions. That would be a big problem – for us. And of course, though we’ve argued for years that government is so incompetent that it can’t do anything, we’re going to pretend that we’re so vulnerable that we can’t compete with government. Yes, we know this doesn’t make sense, but we’re going to say it anyway. If we make it sound scary enough, people might not realize they would love to choose to dump us if they could, and that most of them (76%) support giving us a bit of competition.

We hate competition, and so we’re against health reform. And we’re trying to scare you so you are, too.

Boo!

Kudos Jason.  It is clear that the insurance industry is fond of sending clever emails and letters and is counting on their fear-mongering and contributions to members of Congress to get them through this debate.

Well, we’re not gonna let that happen. When Congress returns from their holiday recess, Campus Progress will decend upon the Hill, with over 200 young people, to lobby Congress for health care reform – and demand a public option. We will also be lobbying for a stronger climate bill out of the Senate, and for college affordability through supporting Obama’s direct lending proposal. Get Ready.

(If you’d like to join Campus Progress’ National Lobby Day- apply now!)